Unlicensed Investigator Busted California to go dogs!
former police
BEEN WITH WOMEN COMMIT to bestiality and fraud detective CLIENTS
LOAD
Orange County District Attorney Office Orange County District Attorney
Posted 25/06/2010 – 04.46 clock, Pacific Time
About the Author
Orange County District Attorney Office
A former police officer working as a private investigator without a license was charged today with fraud and intimidating its critics, its customers, including threats from the house of a private investigator burn.
He also worked with the exercise of a conspiracy to have executed the crime of sexual assault of an animal by posting ads on Craigslist to commit sodomy women, was charged with his dog. Kevin Michael Siane, 53, Fountain Valley, has a 63 count criminal complaint was raised. His criminal charges include 20 counts of theft under false pretenses large, 12 counts of fraudulent use of an access card, two counts of second degree commercial burglary, five for possession of a firearm by a criminal, a 1998 conviction for stalking, in four cases of theft with a prior conviction for the same crime in 1999, including four counts of obtaining services power of the misrepresentation, and one each from identity theft, perjury by declaration, computer access and fraud and possession of ammunition by a prohibited person. The misdemeanor charges against Siane include three counts of conspiracy to commit sexual assault on an animal, two counts of dissuading a witness from reporting a crime, in three cases, the production of electricity services misrepresentation, and a count each criminal threats, unlawful representation as a private detective, interference with the activities of private investigation, and the company without a valid license. He faces sentencing enhancements for aggravated white collar crime, and more damage to 0000 000th If convicted Siane faces a maximum sentence of 38 years in state prison. He was arrested on 24th June 2010, Orange County District Attorney (OCDA) investigators and is on bail instead of 0000. He is accused expected Monday, June 28, 2010, at 8.30 clock in the department C-55, Central Justice Center, Santa Ana.circumstances, the defendant worked as a police officer for the 1979-1986 Stanton and Santa Ana Police Department. The Stanton Police Department no longer exists. Between November 2005 and June 2010 is operating illegally possessing Sian and private investigative services without a license under the name of KMS Investigations accused by 4Front Investigations Fore and reviews. Business and Professional Code of 7523 the license by the California Department of Consumer Affairs Office of Security and Investigative requires working as a private detective. The defendant is accused of wrongly identified himself as a private investigator. The defendant is the wrong view of his opinions on various companies on the Internet detectives and referral sites, optimizing search engine presence of the accused. He must believe in the use of these criticisms made to fool potential customers, his company has offices nationally and researchers, if indeed poses a small suite in Fountain Valley, with fewer than five employees who were mainly members of the family.
Sian is an attempt to intimidate and deter fraudulent activities of its witnesses, including two former employees, threatening to use his knowledge and contacts as a former police officer, police reports against false accused his file when his actions reported to the police or the public. He threatens to burn the house of a private investigator, if they do not remove the comments on the Internet, it had posted warning the public about their fraudulent activities.
accused OCDA Bureau of Investigation began investigating the case after receiving a complaint in March 2010, the California Department of Consumer. In the wake of the fraud, investigators found more evidence of a bestiality OCDA conspiracy.
Between October 2009 and January 2010 is Siane of ads on craigslist Looking for defendants to engage in acts of bestiality with his labrador. It is the conspiracy with multiple unknown co-conspirators via e-mail to set up meetings to get to bestiality. Those who accusedis encouraged with additional information, contact Supervising District Attorney Investigator Anthony Sosnowski (714) 347-8814. Assistant district attorney of the Special Unit of work Claustro Israel pursue the matter.
article
Criminal defense of the company’s strategy of sending Wendy Segall to bribe witnesses
criminal defense strategy of the display of the witnesses Wendy Segall Corrupt
Take
: John Fielder
There is an old legal principle
said that “one of the witnesses place was jammed. “Lawyers use this axiom to the juries that they observe the witnesses at trial will not be elected or to plead voluntarily. In fact, they are rarely the people we want our freedoms are at stake or trust in our lives, but too often the heroes of yesterday are now strangers, the point is made poignant by the following: ..
An attorney with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s “stalking and the Threat Assessment Team “has been posting weak claims of corrupt witnesses of” harassment “against Los Angeles to prove to men. claims of stalking are usually difficult to prove and to rely on hearsay testimony and Researchers funded by the grants themselves, as the prosecution team STAT. (Agency California Emergency Management). Leave in addition to the obvious conflict of interest, hearsay is a rule to show up on these case. She said he-said evidence is usually based on assumptions and not a source of email that allows the prosecutor made no attempt to authenticate correctly. First Amendment advocates in Los Angeles observed the abuse by the District Attorney of Los Angeles, so proud, the filing of a civil legitimate, the famous Los Angeles Attorney General gave Sean Erenstoft on behalf of his client against a so-called “victims of criminal harassment. victims “harassment” complaints of the complaint was sustained based on the client’s right of intentional infliction of battery and emotional distress, his client in the hands of the so-called “. The victim was arrested for the crime and images of his client tells the story of a client who was stopping and standing at rest, when he beat his ex-girlfriend.
Erenstoft It was clear that the customer was late to file a civil suit. The victim had to run the police, a preliminary injunction, which led eventually to affect the filing of a complaint against Erenstoft customers. It proved to be a race to the courthouse to be. After the civil suit filed on behalf of his client was unethical to Wendy Segall defender Sean Erenstoft its use of the First Amendment (filing the civil action) for redress of grievances to counter. As mentioned earlier, prosecutors do not have the luxury of choosing to eyewitnesses, but lawyers have a duty to defend their clients zealously pointing out the shortcomings of the witnesses, the “victims” are the District Attorney.
The label “victim” (on which the district attorney) is accepting applications, the reference charge to suppress at trial. While many business defendants and other coarse poorly audience present to a jury, it remains intact, are the defenders to push their customers the right to make false allegations against naked. The filing of civil procedure is a valid mechanism for grievances to be removed. Civil litigation also provides a means (by the Code of Civil Procedure) to information that may be necessary to reach back against the impulse of a biased prosecutor. And of course, the validity of civil litigation or similar proceedings are subject to legal objection to virtually any stage of the litigation. If a prosecutor to investigate the roles of its criminal defense investigators, as Wendy Segall has in the case of People of California v. Stewart, Chris, we should certainly question the ethics of the prosecutor. Was exactly when the Wendy Segall were sent in response to the discovery of the criminal source of e-mails allegedly sent by Chris Stewart educated lawyer Wendy Segall DA investigators were investigating a civil complaint filed against her legitimate victims- witnesses. Criminal Defenders of the exercise of their First Amendment right of customers to have the government remedy for grievances (through the filing of civil actions against the corrupt government witnesses) Petitions should be cautious, Segall Wendy. Wendy Segall research shows that this organization Wendy Segall is a man for crimes they knew they had no evidence to prove an essential element of the crime. In the case of People v. Ghaffari, reversed in the second appeal of the district had received a conviction Segall, painted as they otherwise objectionable to the defendant’s extensive and repetitive recitation of unflattering allegations. The jury was supposed to have confused the bad behavior Ghaffari ladles, with its relatively harmless speech online. He was the unethical behavior of prosecutors, the case had led the jury even though he knew Wendy Segall is the lack of evidence. (See Daily Journal, Friday, September 29th, 2000 -. Court jury in the case of hand cybersex chatFirst Amendment advocates is an organization with reference to examples of heroic lawyers asked again pushed against misconduct by the prosecution. Erenstoft Sean was our lawyers Award in March 2011 awarded for his push-back against the District Attorney of Los Angeles on behalf of its clients. In 2010 suffered a Erenstoft Slapp complaint leveled against him by LADA The irony is that the process is not lost to the FAA, nor the fact that Sean has worked for Erenstoft Los Angeles district attorney prosecuting crimes in the 90 and took his talents in his own firm, where the book was the text of DA used in the defense of its clients for 20 years. For these. Erenstoft Sean is one of the reasons for Civil Rights Hero
* Sean Erenstoft also served as a judge of Los Angeles County Pro-Temp, LA-formed VETS.COM;. and now serves as a process and a management consultant, California
article
Cop perjury CCTV evidence
Although the evidence is recorded by video surveillance cameras is a common factor in the arrest and prosecution of suspected criminals who have recently been several cases that the evidence works both directions. This type of recorded footage is also very useful in a surprising application
as evidence against the police officers of misconduct or to have lying on the witness stand.
said after his testimony before a grand jury, 41 years old New York detective, it was the central role in a drug raid and arrest played in the Bronx in the spring of 2007. On behalf of the officer of the bust began with her and her partner left her vehicle and enter a building through a broken door, two men she suspected were two big boxes full of marijuana to follow. After the detective that she and her partner went to the fourth floor to find the two men then went to the fifth floor when she suspects one of the keys jingling as he entered an apartment. She said they arrested the suspects in addition to them personally, and again two boxes with a total of 33 pounds of marijuana.
The case was led by the two detectives smoothly until one or more of the defendants filed a complaint with the Complaints Commission calendar. After the complaint was filed, found the prosecutor’s office and started shooting, which is removed from the camera system home security started examining. They found that the two detectives separated from their path to the fifth floor minutes of each other and other officers of the police team to arrest, as did with the boxes of marijuana were confisacted, they have not get the drug on their own Faust. These events and others that are mentioned on the stark contrast with the video equipment in his testimony before a grand jury in Bronx District Attorney Robert T. Johnson.
Even if these minor deviations, as seems to be, it is important to note that all the contradictory elements of video surveillance cameras were broadcast to the public. District Attorney Johnson said: “untruthful statements, particularly those who are responsible for enforcing the law strikes at the heart of our justice system and seriously undermines public confidence in our courts Hopefully indictment, the second in the 16 months in one. policeman was charged with perjury, will reinforce the message that we are a zero tolerance for false testimony from anyone, including members of law enforcement officials. “The crimes charges dropped against the suspected marijuana. The detective was arrested and charged with three counts of perjury will be soon, each with a maximum penalty of seven years in prison.
defenders of the police said that the contradictions in his testimony “were honest mistakes.” But it is important to remember that if a police officer “honest mistake” that can be witnessed in criminal cases, these errors can be innocent people are sent to prison. The police have a huge amount of power over ordinary citizens and should definitely be held responsible when it comes to telling the truth. Without the cameras out, Detective “error” we would never know it’s a good thing that there was never such witnesses who lie.
ironmusc